COMMENT: At one point in time, Harris was considered to be unnatural as a point guard. Can anyone picture him as anything BUT a point guard now? Actually shot the ball better against the Big Ten teams than he did earlier in the year, which made his ranking skyrocket. Got the line a ton. Great player.

COMMENT: Still playing out of position as a part-time point guard, Hill has continued to play well. I would love to see him get a shot to abandon the point altogether as I think he is the best shooter in the conference and without as many ballhandling responsibilities, you really might see him explode. As it is, for a perimeter shooter like him to shoot 50% from the field is phenomenal (though typical of Izzo's MSU players). Despite not being a true point, still had a 2 to 1 assist/turnover ratio with 118 assists.

COMMENT: Same old Austin....gobs of assists, good ballhandler, good foul shooter, doesn't (can't) really shoot the ball. He isn't a player that you can win with if he plays heavy minutes, but he isn't a bad role player.

COMMENT: Does a little bit of everything for you. Despite not being a pure shooter, he can hit some threes for you. He distributes the ball. He defends. He makes his free throws.

COMMENT: He made nice incremental improvement this year. He improved his shooting tremendously and didn't force things as much. I like him.

COMMENT: Not much talent but a big heart and he plays smart, which allows him to be efficient even though he really isn't someone you can build around.

COMMENT: An improvement over Burleson. He is another mediocre shooter at the PG position, but seems to distribute the ball well and has a decent handle.

COMMENT: A better player than his rank indicates. His shooting was poor this year but he is otherwise a good looking young point guard. If he can shoot 42% (32% from 3), he becomes a very good player.

COMMENT: Played better late in the year. He is actually a decent shooter despite a poor overall percentage, indicating that shot selection could be an issue. I don't like him as much as Parker, but think he can be ok.

COMMENT: McKnight took on more of a scoring mentality this year. However, his overall numbers did not improve substantially due to less efficiency distributing the ball. He has talent, but I am not a big fan of his game at this point.

COMMENT: The most overrated player in the Big Ten. He wasn't very good his freshman year and he has been bad this year. It has been the same old Horton...tons of terrible shots, a horrible shooting percentage, doesn't create much for his teammates, lots of turnovers, etc. If he gave the truly good players on his team (like Abram) half of his shots, Michigan would be a much better team.

COMMENT: Sooner or later, you would think he would do something to live up to his supposed promise. Has been very consistently awful in his time in college.

COMMENT: I didn't think he could play last year and he has done nothing to give me a second thought to this point.

COMMENT: Just won't be worth a hooey until he can throw the ball into the ocean, which right now he just can't do.

COMMENT: Hard to be too critical since he was a freshman being thrown to the wolves far before he is ready. Who knows long term but right now he stinks.

COMMENT: Went from a major disappointment to a tremendous player. Shooting improvement was well publicized, as was his defensive ability, but also got his ballhandling/decision making under control.

COMMENT: Young came on strong during the Big Ten season last year and he has continued to improve. He is just a really solid player.

COMMENT: What's not to like? He does just about everything well. He has tightend up his handle this year and I believe he was the best player on Michigan's team.

COMMENT: I have never liked Johnson as a player, but I give him credit for a nice year.

COMMENT: Head finally seemed to find his niche and played tremendously late in the year. I like just about everything about him other than he could get to the basket a bit more than settle for the "3", which isn't his game.

COMMENT: His numbers fell a bit this year (shooting and turnovers), but he was a valuable player nonetheless.

COMMENT: Brown has bounced between the #1 and #2 spots and it may have contributed to his poor start. Once he meshed with Williams and Head, he really came on and became the player that everyone expected.

COMMENT: Wright scuffled in terms of shooting the ball, perhaps due to the lack of a viable #2 scorer for the Hoosiers. Subjectively, he would jump a number of people he is currently trailing as he is still a premier player.

COMMENT: Boyd is miscast as a frontline player. That being said, he did contribute in every way he could and did actually do some things besides shoot, which elevated his efficiency rating despite only average shooting.

COMMENT: More of a defensive player than an offensive player, though is offense started showing some positive signs late in the year. Wade is probably a better fit as a point guard but with Harris around, Wade played the off-guard spot. Boo is a poor shooter but has a good AST/TO rate.

COMMENT: Teague earned more and more time as the year went along, and his rating rose. He is a pretty good shooter, though his shot selection and lack of breadth of skills makes him a marginal player overall.

COMMENT: Harris' numbers look a lot like Shannon Brown's in many ways. I like him a bit more though. Looks like a good one.

COMMENT: It will be interesting to see how he develops. I don't know that he really has point skills, but he isn't a pure shooter either. I would assume he will play some sort of combo guard position ala Dee Brown.

COMMENT: If he ever got under control and understood about shot-selection, he would be a nice player.

COMMENT: Unhappy and transferred. Was he unhappy because his play dropped, or did his play drop because he was unhappy (or neither)?

COMMENT: Designated shooter and not much else.

COMMENT: Well regarded but just not any good at this point. Poor shooting and terrible assist/turnover rate. He reminds me of someone like Torbert or Worley in that he looks like a player, but just doesn't get beyond that to actually produce. Spartan fans hope he takes the Torber career path.

COMMENT: Filled the Harrington role for the Illini and did it ok. Designated shooter, but outstanding AST/TO rate suggest that he has more to his game that we have yet to see.

COMMENT: Shot the ball poorly early in the year but came on strong late. He hit 3's but also diversified his game with his ability to get to the line.

COMMENT: Energy player who doesn't bring a lot of numbers to the court, but is a decent intangibles guy. If he just cuts down on his attempts from behind the arc, you can work with him.

COMMENT: Wow, how IU has fallen.

COMMENT: An aggressive player who gets to the line a lot but needs to get under control.

COMMENT: Like Luber, he was being fed too much too fast. He was been a turnover machine/mad gunner for most of the year. Subjectively, he looks ok once he doesn't have to carry the load.

COMMENT: Ick. Someone has to be the worst in the B10

COMMENT: The small forward position in the Big Ten just isn't very good to be frank. There are very few of your classic 6-6/6-7 slashing scorer types. Powell could probably be considered a power forward but someone from Illinois had to go here, so Powell was the man (some might argue that 7-2 Nick Smith is really the "small forward" for the Illini). Powell doesn't have great across the board peripherals, but the man makes a huge percentage of his shots (60%) despite a fair number of attempts. This has a tremendous amount of value to a team. Good rebounder too.

COMMENT: Just a tremendous heart player. Power forward in a shooting guard's body. Aside from his usual outstanding offensive rebounding, Moye even added a perimeter shot late in his senior year.

COMMENT: A nice offensive player. He can score from inside or out. He passes the ball well. He hits his throws. He can face the basket. He is soft and can be loose with the ball, but he is a good fit for the Wildcat offense.

COMMENT: Played dreadfully early in the year, but rebounded late to regain some of his prior status. Overall a disappointing season however, in part due to excessive turnover problems.

COMMENT: He still isn't much of an outside shooter and is still a bit wild with the ball, but he does everything else very well and is a really solid overall player. Actually had more assists than Horton.

COMMENT: Gaines was horrible last year but has improved to at least be a passable bench player (though he was forced to start 17 games).

COMMENT: OK player but his lack of shooting ability (both from the field and the line) will hold him back until he improves.

COMMENT: Crummy free throw shooter but otherwise looks like a decent young player. Doesn't excell at anything yet.

COMMENT: I originally had him at big guard, but was told by an Iowa fan that he really has been playing more at the SF position, so here he is. He is still not very efficient at this point (which seems to be a trend under Alford). He isn't a great shooter, isn't very strong from the line, and has a marginal assist/turnover ratio. Talented, but still not refined.

COMMENT: I believe he was hurt, which may have made him more inclined to hang around on the perimeter rather than attacking the rim. Since he isn't a good enough shooter to rely on this approach, he didn't have a very good year.

COMMENT: A scorer but lacking a complete game. Free throw shooting is atrocious, especially for a player that can get to the line.

COMMENT: He just flat out stinks. Alford finally seemed to be wise up to the realities of his game and his playing time was cut. Turnover machine.

COMMENT: Playing time diminished as his shooting went from mediocre to horrible.

COMMENT: Really made strides throughout his career, but fell off the table this year. People don't seem to recognize what a terrible passer he is. Great heart.

COMMENT: Has improved steadily in his time at Wisconsin and subjectively would rank even higher if we were talking about his completeness as a player.

COMMENT: Isn't a very good defender in some respects, but he is a valuable offensive player. He can shoot the ball, he hits the glass, he is a pretty good passer, he gets to the line and makes his throws. As his minutes raised, the level of his play dropped. He is a guy that is probably better of spotted for 20 minutes, or else his stamina needs to get better.

COMMENT: Tremdously athletic and raw post player really came on as the season progressed. Michigan has some big time athleticism inside for the coming years.

COMMENT: Obviously a good offensive player, though the Big Ten figured out that he really wasn't willing to involve his teammates, which dropped his efficiency tremendously.

COMMENT: Seemed to finally get over the injury rust and was playing very well late in the year. When healthy, he is a good player. Needs to get turnovers under control.

COMMENT: Was the early choice for most improved player in the conference (and he still did improve quite a bit), but once the Big Ten hit, his numbers took a nose-dive. I would guess that he suffered under a lot of defensive attention. Good breath of offensive skills, but turnovers became a problem late in the year.

COMMENT: Like Jagla, his game fell apart once confrence season hit. Has an ok rating, but I don't hold him in much esteem as a player. He makes his garbage hoops though.

COMMENT: Athletic young player still learning the game. Horrible passer. More of an athlete than a player at this point.

COMMENT: I placed him at power forward though he played more wing later in the year and could certainly be placed among the small forwards. He only received bit minutes but shot the ball well and rebounded pretty well on the offensive glass. Needs to improve his passing consistency. He still has a big upside.

COMMENT: Highly touted but didn't play much. Way too early to tell.

COMMENT: Still just a banger but has improved every year. Shot the ball more/better but still wasn't a great rebounder and had a poor handle.

COMMENT: Not much to say. Servicable bench player and that is about it.

COMMENT: I haven't seen him much so can't comment too much, but I do know he is a horrible horrible FT shooter. Active on the glass.

COMMENT: Deane is listed as a point guard, though he really isn't one with the emergence of McKnight. Either way, the guy can play. Despite playing only 27 minutes per game in Purdue's balanced attack, he is incredibly productive. People think of him as a perimeter gunner, though if you look at his numbers, you see that he is actually more effective in transition and as a mid-range scorer. Combined with much improved ball handling and an ability to get to the line, he is arguably the most explosive player in the league.

COMMENT: Harris is not a natural point guard, but has been an offensive force this season. His perimeter shot fell off once Big Ten season began, but he was solid in all facets of the game. Though he does not distribute the ball in the classic point guard manner due to the swing offense, his AST/TO ratio remains good due to solid ball security. His future is bright.

COMMENT: Hill is really a shooting guard that is playing a bit of point (along with forward Alan Anderson). Still, despite being forced to play out of position, he continues to produce at a high level. His handle is still a bit loose to be handling the ball as much as he does and he isn't the prettiest player around, but just a good solid shooter who knows how to put the ball in the hoop.

COMMENT: When you start weeding out the non-true points listed above him and start looking at his performance subjectively, you may be looking at the best point guard in the Big Ten already. Brown's only true weakness is that he doesn't get to the line as much as you might like and hasn't shot well from the line when he has gotten there. Outstanding decision maker for a young player. Exceptionally explosive.

COMMENT: Wow, what a surprise, another point guard that really isn't one. He is however just a good basketball player. He gets my vote for player that suffered the most from the talent around him. I think he is much better than these numbers show as I think he was forced to be such a focal point of the offense that his turnovers and shooting percentage suffered. He is a good perimeter shooter who is brutally strong and can take anybody to the rack.

COMMENT: A good solid player that nobody has heard of (yet). He shoots the ball well from the perimeter, but doesn't just hang around outside either. He hits his throws. He rebounds a little bit. There just isn't much here not to like. However, as teams began focusing on him, his game did suffer a bit which isn't atypical for a freshman. I like him better than Horton.

COMMENT: Coverdale's peripherals continue to look solid. The only reason he doesn't rank as high as you might think is due to a shooting slump. Coverdale never did adjust to his role as an off-guard/combo-guard with the Hoosiers. His shooting might point to the lack of Jeffries in the lane clearing things outside.

COMMENT: Strickland played very well early and worked his way into major playing time. However, like many freshmen he struggled at times when he hit conference play. All in all however, solid play from a freshman point.

COMMENT: One of the most extreme players in the Big Ten. A very solid ballhandler passer with a tremendous amount of assists for his limited playing time, but literally does NOTHING else.

COMMENT: Still feeling his way around the college game, but came on strong late in the year. Great defender but a terrible foul shooter. To think we already have Brown, Parker, Strickland, and Williams as solid freshman point guards, and we haven't even gotten to players like Horner, Horton, McKnight, and Wade.

COMMENT: Doesn't do anything especially well yet, but doesn't do anything terribly poor either. He was never eye-opening, but simply gradually played better and better as he got more comfortable. He will never be a big scorer IMO, but he is one of those guys that is going to have his fingerprints all over the boxcore.

COMMENT: Burleson hurt his team again this year. The guy cannot shoot but that trivial little detail doesn't seem to stop him. Limited players need not be bad players. Limited players that don't know they are limited are bad players.

COMMENT: Was heralded as a difference maker for the Wolverines and is obviously a talented player (and a huge improvement over Avery Queen). Still, right now he is vastly overrated despite his solid raw production. His shot selection is awful and he takes a ton of terrible shots, resulting in a terrible shooting percentage. He also led the league in turnovers with over 100, a totally unacceptable number. If he was a player on a less than talented team who was forced to take on more than he should have (like say Brent Darby), I could probably live with his numbers. But, when you have solid talent around you in Abram, Robinson, Blanchard, Graham, etc. there is no excuse for running around out of control making poor decisions and chucking up shots left and right. Once he matures and gets under control, I would guess he would be pretty good (perhaps even as good as his rep).

COMMENT: Contrast Horner to Horton. Really, there isn't much separating them as players, but because Michigan got off to a hot start, Horton was the guy who got the pub. Has good peripheral numbers but struggled with his shot. Once he figures out where he can get his shots, I think he will be fine.

COMMENT: It took a while for McKnight to settle down, but took control of the Purdue backcourt. He has no perimeter shot right now but makes up for it with solid decision making and good defensive toughness. Does the parade of freshman point guards ever end?

COMMENT: Would probably be a more than decent player if he had more discretion from long range. Handle is still marginal for a point guard. I still believe he would be a better shooting guard than point guard. Like many on the PSU team, Watkins is just a guy being forced to play more of a role than he can handle at this level.

COMMENT: Doesn't look like he can play upon my limited viewing, but still too early to tell. Indicative of Minnesota's backcourt problems that he was looked to late in the year.

COMMENT: Highly thought of by some but struggled last year as well. He was hurt early in the year as well. Just a dreadful shooter right now.

COMMENT: Mr. Irrelevant. Got some playing time as the year went on....but shouldn't have.

COMMENT: Lowe has long been one of my favorite Big Ten players and a regular on my All-Underrated Team. After missing last season, Lowe has come back strong this year to put up very good numbers. He is a strong player who takes good shots and very effective getting to the line. He also gives the Boilers a stronger defensive presence and some toughness that was missing last year. His injury late in the year took its toll on the Boilers.

COMMENT: Like Dee Brown, a strong case can be made for Wright already being tops at his position in the conference. Just a darn good overall player. Once he tightens up his handle, he will be a star (if he isn't already). Wright missed a handful of games with some injury problems, but talent wise is as good as anyone in the league.

COMMENT: Young has always been a guy that subjectively looked good, but his numbers have never backed that up...until the latter half of the Big Ten season when he really came into his own. A tough player with some versatility. He has become one of my favorite players.

COMMENT: Leslie played the point last year and played well until given the starting job. This year, unencumbered by ballhandling duties, he has been turned loose as a scorer. Leslie is very quick and creates a lot off the dribble which offsets being a mediocre shooter. Leslie has been a nice productive player for the Hawks.

COMMENT: A versatile player who can play either guard position. Head got off to a slow start due to injury, but played very well as the season progressed. Will do fine when/if given a bigger role on the team.

COMMENT: Horton got the press, but this fella was the best freshman on the Wolverine team IMO and is one of the more underrated players in the league. He is a bit loose with the ball, but once that tightens up, you are going to have a versatile and dangerous offensive player. A lot like Robinson overall as a player (but better offensively and worse defensively).

COMMENT: Hargrow could have also been put at small forward as he is more or less a combo swing player. Either way, he has been a surprise scoring leader source for the Gophers. Hargrow is a good solid shooter who doesn't make a ton of mistakes. However, much of his value comes in his ability to get to the free throw line.

COMMENT: His ranking fell considably once his shooting percentage came down to earth. He isn't very offensively diverse, but in addition to his role as a shooter, he makes good decisions with the ball (3 to 1 AST/TO). No, he isn't the best shooting guard in the league, but he is the kind of guy you win titles with if he is a supporting player.

COMMENT: Owens has gone from a truly poor offensive player to a decent one. He has continued to learn how to create shots and is a good free throw shooter. He still can play out of control, but finds a way to make it work for him.

COMMENT: Just as last year, still just a shooter for the most part. Chambliss takes a ton of shots, about 2/3 of which are 3's. Deadly from the line. He is better than I thought he would be, but not someone that can be relied on as a focal point of a team. Would look great as a third option type on a good team.

COMMENT: I've always liked Connolly and had high hopes for him earlier this year. He wasn't bad, but really is just your run of the mill shooting guard as he doesn't do anything great.

COMMENT: I felt that Torbert was really overrated last year. He has improved this year, but still isn't all that good given his hype. He isn't much of a shooter and doesn't see the floor very well, but as long as he can create inside and in the mid-range and defends as hard as he does, he has some value.

COMMENT: Teague is a solid designated shooter, but offers little else at this early stage of his career.

COMMENT: Hated him last year. Hate him this year. Good perimeter shooter but is still just an out of control gunner who refuses to pass the ball.

COMMENT: While at Northwestern, I heard many people claim that they believed Johnson was a great player stuck on a bad team. I have never thought he was anything above average. Shoots the ball like a football player (though his 3-point % is good).

COMMENT: Poor shooting but really didn't play enough to draw too many conclusions.

COMMENT: If he is hitting the long range bomb, he is passable as a role player. This year, he often didn't and had zero value.

COMMENT: As often happens, as a guy plays more, his efficiency numbers drop. Nondescript player.

COMMENT: Injured early and highly thought of, but just didn't play very well.

COMMENT: I'm sure his mother loves him, but he can't play Big Ten basketball.

COMMENT: Despite how crummy his numbers look, I actually think he has a decent future as he is very active and does some things on the court that he can build on.

COMMENT: Exploded during the Big Ten season to become close to an elite level player. Plays essentially a point forward spot for MSU which results in a very high turnover total (relative to small forwards). Anderson is a good passer and has improved his overall shooting. Though he isn't a great perimeter shooter he gets to the line quite a bit to offset this weakness. I wasn't a fan, but have quickly become one.

COMMENT: Bauer just continues to steadily improve despite coming off the bench for part of the year. His overall shooting percentage is still a bit low as I think he is too content to fire from beyond the arc, but he puts some points on the board and has an underrated floor game. I love his energy. Needs a haircut.

COMMENT: A small forward in a big guard's body. Moye is a tremendous rebounder for a player his size. As he received more time, he played better (or was it the other way around). Just a tough player who doesn't hurt you and can get you some tough baskets inside.

COMMENT: Another step up this year for Penney. What is most impressive is that his AST/TO ratio used to be his big bugaboo. This year, his ratio is over one and he leads the Badgers in assists, helping him become a more complete player. Kirk has done a nice job of not forcing things which has resulted in limited shots at times. He didn't shoot as well from long range as I thought, but is still a terrific collegiate player.

COMMENT: Kiefer is a bit player that simply had a very solid all around season. He isn't as good as his TOE would indicate, though he is still a valuable bench player.

COMMENT: Very active player who has always struck you as being better than his overall numbers showed. However, I think it is now safe to say that he is what he is, a streaky skilled player that simply doesn't play under enough control to be considered an great player. He brings a lot of energy to the floor, but just has too many weaknesses (perimeter shooting and decision making) to rate much higher. Excellent defender.

COMMENT: I have never been a fan of Worley's...big time body...so-so game. His overall game is decent, except for the fact that he is a turnover machine, robbing his team of valuable possessions. Still could be a good player if he could clean this aspect of his game up.

COMMENT: Was an almost total zero last year, so improving to average is a step up. Is a fairly versatile player. Could help a good team off the bench. He is a good passer and if he improves his perimeter shot, will be pretty good.

COMMENT: I listed him at SG last year, but is playing the small forward position in a 3 guard offense, much like Penney. Only difference from last year to this year is that he isn't shooting as well from behind the arc. Physically looks like Penney and began his career as a similar player, but Penney broadened his game. Hornsby has not.

COMMENT: Fairly promising player who didn't like sitting on the bench , probably pouted a bit, didn't play as well, and then quit the team.

COMMENT: Bit player who does a little bit of everything except pass (4 assists in 260 minutes) .

COMMENT: Welcome to the Big Ten. Like many young players, had an outstanding non-conference season but discovered just how tough the Big Ten. He is another good looking freshman though. He has good range on his jumper and is a solid passer for a young swing player.

COMMENT: We are now getting into the range at which players cease to become useful. There are still players below that I would consider good players, but that is due to their production. Guys who aren't overly productive (like Esselink) AND have marginal TOE ratings don't have a ton of value. He is one of those active players who appears to be doing something to help you...until you look at the box score.

COMMENT: Garnered league mention last year which was totally undeserved in my opinion. However, his game totally fell apart this year. He has to be on drugs or having girlfriend problems or something (just kidding as I have no idea if he has any personal issues). Just doesn't shoot the ball well enough to be considered anything more than below-average in my book. Someone tell him to move in.

COMMENT: Not ready to play yet.

COMMENT: Cook came on like gangbusters last year and has elevated his play even further this season. In my mind, he is the runaway POTY in the Big Ten. Cook has always been effective on the wing at times, but is playing more in the post this season and is a matchup nightmare for just about everybody. AST/TO rate is still mediocre, but the guy puts points on the board, which garners him the top efficiency rating in the Big Ten.

COMMENT: I had him listed as a SF before the Big Ten season started, but moved him to PF as that is essentially where he spent most of the season. Bracey Wright, Daniel Horton and Dee Brown have gotten the pub, but Alando has been right there with them as the top frosh in the conference in a great year for first year players. Tucker is arguably the best offensive rebounder in the Big Ten, giving the Badgers their first player of this type since perhaps Cory Blackwell. This has resulted in a high shooting percentage.

COMMENT: Will never be an offensive option and can be sloppy with the ball, but Anagonye is perhaps the best banger/garbage player in the league. He is a good solid player due to his strength and willingness to use that strength. Works hard on the glass and is an effective finisher under the hoop.

COMMENT: Blanchard has always been a high profile player, but last year he really scuffled along at times. He is taking a ton of shots this year, but has shot the ball well from beyond the arc in particular. He is a great rebounder for his size, though still doesn't pass the ball as well as he should. Probably the second best power forward in the league after Cook when all is considered.

COMMENT: Wilkinson is a terrific player who suffers due to the depth of power forwards in the Big Ten this year. He struggled early with his shot, especially from long range, but continued to improve his overall game to keep his efficiency rating right where it was last year. When his shot started falling, you had yourself a marvelous player. Wilkinson is a surprisingly effective offensive rebounder for a guy without big hops. He could be put at center, where he more or less played much of the year, where he would rank 4th in TOE, but probably rank as the second best of the group.

COMMENT: He shot the ball very well early, which distorted his early numbers. As his sample size grew larger, he came back down to earth. Still, I like him as a very good role player.

COMMENT: Dials put up great numbers in limited time as a freshman. He missed most of the year this year (which means his numbers did not have a chance to level out in Big Ten play like most players). His loss basically ruined any chance OSU had at having a good season.

COMMENT: Newton got off to a miserable start, but played better during the Big Ten season. He is a lousy shooter for a guy that should clean up in the post against many opponents, but is long and athletic and is a guy you have to contain. Despite some hype, I don't view him as being an all-conference type player.

COMMENT: Had a horrible horrible start, but finally got things going about mid-season. I think the big thing for him is that he just doesn't want to do the dirty work inside that a player of his skills should be thriving with. There really is little to separate Rickert from Brian Cook in terms of skill, but Cook has embraced his ability to dominate in the post, while Rickert spends half of the time roaming around the perimeter and the rest shooting fadeaways in the lane. I realize that he has the ability to play outside, but until Rickert decides to play for Minnesota and not the NBA, he just isn't going to be the star he should be.

COMMENT: I thought we would be one of the top 10 or so players in the Big Ten this year, but his play has regressed totally for whatever the reason. Still wandered around a bit on the perimeter more than I would like to see, but never put things together this year and was a key reason that MSU disappointed.

COMMENT: Designated bruiser/defender inside. I like him as he doesn't take a ton of shots away from his teammates. I believe he gets a lot out of limited basketball skills.

COMMENT: Biggest hope is that he doesn't hurt you too much. Just a body.

COMMENT: Production has gone up but efficiency has gone down, perhaps in part due to the increased role he is playing on his team. Probably would be better off if he didn't look to shoot as much and became more of a role player (but didn't have that choice with OSU this year).

COMMENT: Unlike Egekeze who has a crummy rating because he doesn't do anything, Jagla's numbers stink because he does a lot of things poorly. For instance, he shot a whopping 12% from three point range. So, it was probably a rare occasion when he attempted one right? Wrong. He took 42 attempts from behind the arc. WHY IN GOD'S NAME WOULD YOU KEEP SHOOTING THEM???!! He flat out sucks.